Changing the interview loop
We built a custom OpenRound for PostHog, showing what an AI native interview would look like at scale.
Note: This is not an official PostHog assignment, just a demonstration we put together to show what an AI-native technical interview could look like for their engineering loop.
Custom assessment
An AI native assessment built around the kind of engineering work that PostHog actually does, focused on the skills that predict day-one performance.
A customer's PostHog funnel reports ~38% conversion; their internal dashboard says ~62%. Diagnose, fix the pipeline, and ship a HogQL query whose number can be defended.
What is OpenRound
One 60–90 minute task on a real codebase, with complete AI access. No leetcode, no take-homes, no technical screens. See how a candidate ships with AI.
Every assessment is a real engineering task on a real repo, the kind of work the candidate would actually do in their first week on the job.
Candidates use Claude Code, Cursor, or whatever they prefer, and we capture how they prompt, verify, debug, and ship along the way.
A single OpenRound replaces both a take-home and a technical screen, and gives you a calibrated rubric across foundations, agency, and taste.
Hiring process
OpenRound slots into your existing loop and replaces the slowest, lowest-signal parts, which usually means the take-home and the first technical screen.
Public hiring data on PostHog is sparse and changes often, so the left column is our best guess at a typical loop rather than a verified process.
Typical loop
With OpenRound
Other assessments
Real engineering problems we've built for other AI-native teams, which we can adapt for you or use as a starting point for something new tailored to your stack.
Run your first OpenRound and see the difference in signal.